Looking
at the original context it is pretty clear that what is talked about is an
inordinate desire to have one’s neighbor’s property, whether that be real
estate, financial resources or even slaves or wives who were considered
property.
Immediately
my mind plays games to help me escape the condemnation of this commandment. I
say to myself, “I do not covet my neighbor’s specific house, beautiful spouse
or new Mercedes. I only want one just like it. That surely is not
coveting.”
Then
I hear the defensive assertion, “It is the desire to have more things than
one’s parents had that made America great.” Surely it is a legitimate wish of
each parent that their child have greater resources than they.
So
what’s the big deal? I think the big deal addressed in these commandments is
CONTENTMENT. It is the directive to not let my contentment be dependent on my possessions, especially when I compare my assets with my neighbors, particularly those who seem to have more than I do.
Of
course, it goes beyond just discontent and wanting more, better, newer, more
expensive… , although this gets me into enough trouble. It is when these
desires not only leave me unhappy with what I have, but then also lead me to
plan how I can get more, outstrip my neighbors, raise my social economic
aspirations and that becomes the basis for life’s satisfaction and impels
me to work seventy-hour weeks.
So
I end up looking at these commandments and confessing, “I have not kept them.”
But it also brings me up short with the wonderful reminder to be content with
what I have, to live within my means, to share with those who need it, to
rejoice with my neighbor in her good fortune and in the meantime to joyfully
enjoy the blessings and the bounty of each day. And if I am going to covet,
then maybe I should covet virtues like faith, hope, love and contentment.
No comments:
Post a Comment