Anyone who has been
active in Lutheran elementary schools knows that the relationship between the
principal of the school and the pastor of the sponsoring congregation is vital
for the school’s success. And this was even more important in the 1950:s when
the relationship between the school and the congregation was more mutually
dependent than it is now.
My first pastor was
someone I will simply designate as Pr. RB. He entered the pastoral ministry
later in life, leaving a successful business as a mechanic. There was a crisis
in his life and he promised God that if God got him out of the crisis he would
become a pastor. I am glad the crisis was resolved and I wish he had remained a
mechanic. He was better qualified for that than for serving as a parish pastor.
He was a good man. He
had a special heart for the poor, especially also the homeless. He never turned
down a beggar who showed up at his door. He often found some small task or
assignment for the needy but then he helped.
He was very supportive
of the school and was, in fact, the founding pastor of the school. His wife
taught in the school. H e was kind to me. But there was a major issue. He was
(I am firmly convinced) an alcoholic. He denied this. His wife was an enabler.
He kept liquor right next to him in his office desk.
The situation became
very public more than once, but especially at a Lenten worship service. As he
began to lead the service it was obvious to all that he “was under the
influence”. After the initial reading I hurried to the closed area behind the
altar and met him there while the next hymn was being sung. I told him
,”Pastor, it looks like you are not well. I do not think you can continue with
the sermon. Just let me go out and explain that you are not well. I will give a
brief message.” He resisted me. When I insisted it almost became physical so I
let him continue. By the next morning the word was buzzing throughout the
town of Tracy. “Last night the pastor of The Lutheran Church showed up to
preach-and he was drunk.”
We attempted
interventions with the District (Synod). Unfortunately they just transferred
the problem. He served one parish after another with the same “issue” making
him ineffective. Seven years later we had a dinner appointment with
him. When we got to his home his wife said “I am sorry. R. cannot be with us.
He is not well. He cannot speak to or be with you.”
--> As I reflect on this whole experience I recall that I may have been a threat to him. I was young and eager and creative. I had the full support of the school and congregation. People were coming to me with their “pastoral problems.” I wish I had been more supportive and more confrontive. May he rest in peace.
No comments:
Post a Comment